Name : Krisnataniel
Foundations
For A Social Theology: Praxis, Process And
Salvation
1. The Move to Praxis in Theology
Teologi
praxis an the practice of teologi, practice from reflection from action and the
reflection is doing not stopped but the teology praxis is doing as sircular.
Many people practice from teology praxis to oppose toward the injustice. A
glaring discrepancy does exist between theory and practice, faith and
experience, life and religion. In addition to this fundamental option for the
poor, the praxis of liberation opens up a whole new perspective on our
understanding of what constitutes knowledge and truth. In fact it points the
way to the emergence of a new epistemology, a theme we will have more to say
about in chapter three. As Gutierrez points out it involves: breaking with the
old ways of thinking and knowin and recognizing that a great change has taken
place in the way people come to know truth and relate it to their practice in
history. This new way of knowing the truth is bound up inextricably with the
experience of the praxis of liberation. The praxis of liberation becomes the
key to knowledge and truth: knowledge is bound up with transformation. We come
to know history in the process of transforming it and ourselves. As Vico put it
long ago, we really know only what we ourselves do.
An
adequate assessment of liberation theology is clearly beyond the scope of this
chapter. However, some initial remarks about its emphasis on the praxis of
liberation theology is in order. David Tracy’s statement that ‘the theological
landscape. Has been changed irretrievably’ by liberation theology can hardly be
questioned. Liberation theology has given a practical as distinct from a purely
theoretical orientation to the Christian faith that was not always visible in
the recent past. Further, it has and is providing a powerful Christian witness
and counter force in situations of extreme injustice in the world today. In
addition it has overcome the tendency towards individualism, privatization, and
apoliticism that char acterised Christian faith so much in the early half of
this century. In contrast ogden understands theology as a process and product
of a certain kind of critical reflection from action. As a process it is
concerned with the two-fold question of the meaning and truth of the Christian
witness of faith. As aproduct, it is concerned with areasoned answer to the
question about the meaning and truth of the Christian witness. As both process
and product, theology is involved with the ultimate question of the meaning and
truth of human existence. This latter constitutes the basic commitment of the
theologian.The second area of major criticism by Ogden concerns the conceptual
aspects of liberation theology. According to Ogden, liberation theologians tend
‘to focus on the existential meaning of God for us without dealing at all
adequately with the metaphysical being of God himself.
thanks for reading....!
0 comments:
Post a Comment